Another interpretation to explain high positivity rates is that physicians diagnostic skill increases. They test fewer patients whom they believe have a low probability of having disease. This may be particularly true in a resource poor area either because patients can’t afford the test or it isn’t easily available.
That’s a good point. I think my personal batting average in MA last year was 2 of 3. Most of my colleagues tested 0-1 people. But I knew to look beyond the rash.
That said, you’re not going to get 65% positivity on anything acute. Ya know?
Glad it was useful! Sometimes posts like these are less “popular” than others which are widely read/shared beyond the subscribers. But people do miss these ones when I don’t have time to do them. Always a balance. Thank you for being here!
Another interpretation to explain high positivity rates is that physicians diagnostic skill increases. They test fewer patients whom they believe have a low probability of having disease. This may be particularly true in a resource poor area either because patients can’t afford the test or it isn’t easily available.
That’s a good point. I think my personal batting average in MA last year was 2 of 3. Most of my colleagues tested 0-1 people. But I knew to look beyond the rash.
That said, you’re not going to get 65% positivity on anything acute. Ya know?
Very good data & citations Dr. Faust, as usual. ✍️ Thx.
Glad it was useful! Sometimes posts like these are less “popular” than others which are widely read/shared beyond the subscribers. But people do miss these ones when I don’t have time to do them. Always a balance. Thank you for being here!