Patient Safety Network abruptly cut by Trump administration.

The latest DOGE destruction targets a respected project that helped protect Americans from medical errors by supporting a cultural shift around safety.

We’ve got an important scoop that I wanted to share with you now because it may fly under the radar given everything that’s going on. But it’s a noteworthy example of the lack of thought and care that the administration is putting into its wanton cuts of our health system.

---

Inside Medicine is 100% supported by your upgrades. I hope you’ll consider pitching in, if you’re able. (And if you can’t upgrade due to financial considerations, just email me and it’s all good). Thank you!

---

The Trump administration suddenly cut all funding for the Patient Safety Network (PSNet) on Friday, Inside Medicine has learned. PSNet is an influential and respected project within HHS that has been dedicated to decreasing medical errors through research and knowledge dissemination. The endeavor has been credited with saving lives by helping change the culture by which clinicians learn from mistakes, thereby improving care.

The announcement came a day after HHS announced plans to terminate around 10,000 of its employees. The plans also included the “merging” of AHRQ (the agency that has administered PSNet) with another agency, to “enhance research that informs the Secretary’s policies and improves the effectiveness of federal health programs.” Cutting PSNet the very next day, it seems to me, goes directly against that goal, and calls into question the sincerity of the endeavor.

News of PSNet’s fate was provided by Dr. Patrick Romano, a UC Davis pediatrician who, until now, had served as the co-editor-in-chief of PSNet's Editorial Team. Here’s Dr. Romano’s statement to Inside Medicine:

The University of California Davis is proud and honored to have been part of the Pantheon team supporting AHRQ's Patient Safety Network (PSNet) for the past six years.

Due to shifting priorities for the Agency, the team will no longer be supporting PSNet.

The funding has ended. The website remains live for now but is no longer being updated or maintained.

We sincerely thank our 41,000 subscribers and millions of readers across the country, and we encourage users to access PSNet resources while they remain available.

PSNet was described as “the go-to resource online for trustworthy info and up-to-date studies on patient safety,” said Dr. Gordon Schiff, a Harvard Medical School colleague of mine, when we spoke last night. Schiff made news of his own recently (first reported in Inside Medicine) as one of the plaintiffs in an ACLU-supported censorship case against the Trump administration. In the complaint, Dr. Schiff argued that the administration had violated the First Amendment by tone-policing PSNet, requiring certain words to be deleted from previously published papers, or else be taken offline. Dr. Schiff described the loss of PSNet as immeasurable. “It’s the glue for the patient safety community,” he said.

A trusted resource, making patients safer through transparency.

The culture around medical errors changed dramatically this century, after a landmark document identified that the silence around mistakes had for too long meant that nothing was being learned. Transparency, it was argued could save lives. While thoughtful analyses indicate that the number of deaths from medical errors is likely lower than some of the headline-grabbing estimates you may have read, the problem is real nonetheless.

“When something goes wrong in the hospital, should that be hidden and covered up, or should there be a culture of sharing and honesty about what went wrong?” Schiff asked. PSNet attracted researchers to make contributions because of its reach and rigor, and patients because of its authority stemming from its status within HHS and the peer-review vetting that every resource on the site received prior to publication. In other words, PSNet was seen as an oasis of reliability in a messy internet.

One seasoned expert agreed. “As an Emergency Department chief at a safety net hospital, I’ve relied on…PSNet’s extensive library of evidence-based resources—from best-practice guidelines and case studies to education modules and patient safety toolkits,” Dr. Jeremiah Schuur told me via email last night. “Providers at every level, from nurses and pharmacists to hospital administrators, turn to this platform for strategies that reduce errors, lower costs, and improve outcomes.”

He added that the Trump administration’s decision to close the “cornerstone” of patient safety will hurt the general public by “compromising the quality and consistency of care across the entire healthcare landscape.”

What specifically are we losing here? Actionable information.

Why are cancer diagnoses delayed? Why are endometriosis diagnoses delayed? Are test results being communicated to patients in a timely and appropriate manner? Are doctors overusing antibiotics? On the other hand, what leads to delays in sepsis diagnosis and treatment?

If any of that matters to you, then you’d want PSNet to continue its mission as the epicenter for work like that, and more like it.

“We need a home for three decades of work on patient safety. We need a forum where new ideas can be advanced and controversies debated. We should be shining a light on medical errors, medication errors, diagnostic errors—not just that they are happening but what we are doing about it so that we can move forward, and make advances,” Schiff said.

Even a brief look at the current website gives a flavor of the work being championed by PSNet. As of Friday, the project’s homepage highlighted recent work on adverse events around telehealth—an important innovation, but not a perfect one. Another highlighted study concerned communication errors in healthcare. Another assessed how large language models (AI) could be vulnerable to data attacks.

“How can you destroy all that?” Schiff asked. “The cumulative investment of all the thinking and curation and wisdom—it makes no sense.” He also bemoaned the apparent lack of reasoning or accounting around why this is being done. “It just feels like slash-and-burn.”

Improve it, don’t incinerate it.

PSNet has likely saved many lives, according to Paula Griswold, the Executive Director of the Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors, an organization involved in public education on patient safety. Griswold said that PSNet’s clinical goals, including infection prevention and improvements in medication safety, had already had a huge impact. But, she said, the project could even do more. “Let’s improve it, not shut it down,” she said.

Axing PSNet is counterproductive, she said, because decreasing medical errors not only improves outcomes but saves both private and public money. “To cut that off at the knees shows a complete lack of understanding of the challenges.”

Actionable information.

The experts I spoke to emphasized the practical and applicable knowledge that PSNet has disseminated to clinicians and the public. Unlike many government-funded programs whose impacts on the public are not always immediately apparent, PSNet focused on directly applicable information, “helping move ideas into action that isn’t available in a lot of places,” Griswold said. “They put information out for free that turned intellectual concepts into behavioral practice, and that made people safer.”

She especially noted that PSNet has provided insights to improve the safety culture in healthcare by gleaning expertise from both frontline clinicians and patients. “It has helped patients and family members learn how to ask better questions.”

That’s all we have for now! If you have information about any of the unfolding stories we are following, please email me or find me on Signal at InsideMedicine.88.

---

Thanks for reading, sharing, speaking out, and supporting Inside Medicine! Please ask your questions in the comments.

---