Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lynne Hodgman's avatar

Hi, hoping that studying the pandemic isn't focussed only on next time. Too many of us are still dealing with the effects of *this* time, and feeling vulnerable and unprotected by our communities -- plus suffering from the little-understood ills of long-COVID. Thank you for all you do!

Expand full comment
Jenn H's avatar

I agree with some other commenters that dealing with COVID is still timely. I especially liked the discussion around your chorus -- it was a good example of how we can incorporate common-sense guidelines to do fun things, but not abandon all precautions. One thing that has been really distressing is how people have gone from maximal precautions to nothing, pretending that it's 2019 again--wholesale abandonment of masking, testing, and even laxness around vaccinating. Surely we can find a happy science-based medium!

I also appreciate your correcting the record on COVID revisionism. Many forget how terrible 2020 was, especially in areas like NY and parts of Italy where the sick really did overwhelm the health-care system, and how necessary "flattening the curve" really was.

Another thing that strikes me is how effective the original vaccines were: it seems like we've effectively eradicated original COVID, haven't we?

And I think in the story of vaccines, one big fact gets constantly overlooked: when we talk about "the unvaccinated" of 2021-2022, there was a huge pool of people who lived everywhere throughout the population and didn't get vaccinated, not because they refused, but because they couldn't: children. I know child-specific testing was necessary, but I would be very interested in a look at how the delay in offering vaccines to *everyone* affected how the pandemic played out, and the rise of delta and omicron variants.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts